Weather in Brum Where The Sun Always Shines On The Blues.

Thursday 31 December 2020

Facebook to outlaw the word “ ZIONIST” as anti- semitic - Jewish Voice for Peace


Many of us recently learned that Facebook is considering adopting a controversial definition of antisemitism that would include the use of “Zionist” as an antisemitic slur. If adopted, legitimate critiques of the state of Israel that include the word “Zionist” may fall under Facebeook’s rubric of hate speech.

This situation is alarming.

We know how false and dangerous this line of reasoning is. While narrower in scope, Facebook’s definition of antisemitism takes cues from the working definition formulated by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), which conflates antisemitism with all forms of anti-Zionism, including the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement. This definition, which is rapidly gaining traction in several regions of the world, is at the center of a coordinated effort to silence legitimate speech and prevent Palestinians and their allies from holding the Israeli government accountable for its unjust policies of dispossession, occupation, disenfranchisement, and incarceration.

Combatting the IHRA definition of antisemitism, and its offshoots, will be a defining and urgent struggle for the Palestinian rights movement in the coming years, and alongside our Palestinian allies, JVP will be at the forefront of this fight. There are just four days left for JVP to raise the funds we need to continue our work in 2021 for political freedom and social justice—will you join me and pitch in $36 today?

If adopted by Facebook, this definition would suppress political speech on the world’s largest social media platform and deprive Palestinians of a critical venue for expressing their political viewpoints to the world. And it would do nothing to address the growing threat of the actual and appalling antisemitism stoked by right-wing movements and states. Counter to Facebook’s stated goal of fostering connection, this kind of censorship would only erect walls, heighten division, suppress political freedom, and give a free pass to injustice.

Apart from a chilling effect on social media, any definition of antisemitism that includes anti-Zionism would, if accepted, threaten free speech, scholarly inquiry on the Middle East, academic freedom on campuses, and the ability of nonprofits to support projects in and for Palestine, while establishing a dangerous norm for governments across the world.

To dismantle antisemitism, we have to know its history, how best to identify its forms, and how to devise strategies for defeating its every instance. Conflating antisemitism with anti-Zionism makes this work impossible, and it rejects the powerful Jewish tradition of affirming social and racial justice—which supports the critique of Zionism—for which we stand.

If the charge of antisemitism becomes a tactic to suppress open criticism and debate on the State of Israel—its illegal annexations of Palestinian land, its ongoing practice of dispossessing Palestinians from their homes and lands, the violent suppressions of Palestinian freedom—then the charge will turn out to be a mere instrument exploited for the purposes of keeping reactionary forces in power. It will lose its power to describe reality truthfully. The historical reality of antisemitism in our times, including the rise of Neo-Nazis here and abroad, will be diminished or denied, and the actual struggle against all racisms will be robbed of the language it needs to show that the fight against antisemitism and for social justice in Palestine are linked struggles for all of us who demand a more just world.

JVP has always worked to dismantle antisemitism while fighting unapologetically for Palestinian liberation. Can you make a contribution today?

No other organization fights for Palestinian rights and freedoms and animates Jewish social justice principles with the strength, integrity, and clarity of JVP. Help us win this battle, and the next.

In solidarity,

head shotJudith Butler.

 

Military-Industrial Complex Speech, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961

 My fellow Americans: 

Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor. 

This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen. 

Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all. 

Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation. 

My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years. 

In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together. 

II. 

We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment. 

III. 

Throughout America's adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad. 

Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology -- global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger is poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle -- with liberty the stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment. 

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research -- these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel. 

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs -- balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage -- balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration. 

The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only. 

IV. 

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction. 

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea. 

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations. 

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. 

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. 

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together. 

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades. 

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government. 

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers. 

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present 

and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientifictechnological elite. 

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society. 

V. 

Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we -- you and I, and our government -- must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow. 

VI. 

Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect. 

Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield. 

Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose differences, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war -- as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years -- I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight. 

Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road. 

VII. 

So -- in this my last good night to you as your President -- I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find some things worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future. 

You and I -- my fellow citizens -- need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation's great goals. 

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America's prayerful and continuing aspiration: 

Source:
Public Papers of the Presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960, p. 1035- 1040 

The Crown - Seasons 3 and 4.

 






The Brits didn’t always adore their kings and queens. Mary Queen of Scots lost her head on February 8, 1587, and King Charles I lost his on January 30, 1649. King Edward VIII and his wife, Wallis, cavorted with Nazis and engaged in treasonous behavior, though they were only exiled after Edward abdicated. These days, the monarchy is one of the few things that the Brits have to cluck about. Brits can’t seem to get enough of the royals, though they’ve heard the same stories over and over again.

The December 28, 2020 issue of People magazine has a cover story about the “real” Princess Kate, wife of Prince William, and mother of their three children. It depicts Kate, her husband and kids as just another close-knit family that shops at the Sainsbury supermarket near their country home in Norfolk. People magazine casts royalty as exalted and at the same time as down home.

The royals aren’t just another family, as The Crown, the popular Netflix series amply demonstrates. They are wealthier and more powerful than the garden variety British family. If The Crown is to be believed, the royals are also much more venial and hideous than ordinary Brits. They don’t behead anyone these days, but they punish those who don’t toe the line. Personal lives and personal happiness don’t matter. The bloodline does. The show must go on.

When I watched the first two seasons of The Crown, I was reminded of my life in England in the 1960s when I never stood as “God Save the Queen” played in movie theaters. Watching seasons three and four I asked myself, “What would the British historian E. P. Thompson think of the series? I believe that he might say there’s too much tabloid history, and too much about the sex lives of Philip, Charles, Lady Di, Camilla, Princess Margaret and Princess Anne, though there’s nothing X-rate about Fuckingham Palace. Thompson would probably say that there’s not enough about class conflict and especially not enough about the British working class, how it was made and how it helped to make the nation.

The author of books about Blake and William Morris and a classic about British workers, Thompson helped to popularize “history from the bottom up.” Jesse Lemisch apparently coined that phrase in the early 1960s in an SDS pamphlet. The Crown is the antithesis of history from the bottom up. Indeed, it’s history from the top down and with very little “down,” though there are plenty of servants who scrape and bow, but don’t have names or lives of their own.

Thompson might say that to understand the British monarchy one also has to understand its “subjects.” After all, there can’t be kings and queens without commoners.

The series occasionally places working class Brits front and center. It treats Welsh miners sympathetically, but working and middle class folk mostly appear as extras. They’re on screen to show how popular the royal family is with “the public,” as Queen Elizabeth II calls the people of England.

Season three depicts Princess Margaret and LBJ together and suggests that they’re both cut from the same crude cloth. Margaret calls the royal family an “endangered species,” and endangers herself.

Season four is probably the best so far. It pits Queen Elizabeth II, who can be tough as well as compassionate, against Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, the Iron Lady, who is as nasty and as reactionary as any royal. The relationship between the two women culminates near the end of season four when Thatcher asks the Queen to dissolve parliament. That she will not do. “I’m protecting democracy,” Elizabeth says. She’s also protecting her family, her image, and the status quo.

Season four concludes with the Conservative Party in mutiny against Thatcher, and the end of her eleven-years at Ten Downing Street, during which time she aimed to beat the working class into submission and remake Britain as an imperial power by going to war in the Falklands. Prime Minister Harold Wilson has some of the best lines in the series. “Everything is political,” he says. “When people are angry they throw stones at their leaders.” In The Crown, the people are rarely angry with their leaders. They don’t throw stones at Fuckingham Palace, Parliament, or 10 Downing Street. The media does that metaphorically.

The series suggests that the Brits love fairy tales, even when they’re “fractured,” to borrow a word from The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show. It also suggests that the Brits will suffer fops like Prince Charles if they can relish feisty, glamorous royals like Princess Di, who suffers from bulimia. Time after time, we see her kneeling in front of a “throne”—a toilet, that is—and puking her guts out. One wonders if the producers, writers and directors of The Crownintended viewers to link the throne on which Elizabeth sits with the throne in Di’s bathroom. I hope so.

Season four ends with D’s face on the screen. We know what’s coming next:  the lovers, the car crash and the deification of a young woman who married a prince and didn’t live happily ever after.

 

Tuesday 29 December 2020

PALESTINE SOLIIDARITY CAMPAIGN





The struggle for the rights of the Palestinians is one of the great causes of our time. The theft of their land, destruction of their homes, collective punishment of the people of Gaza, transportation of their children, military occupation and the permanent disruption of daily life – all this shames the world.

Israel disregards International Law, the Geneva conventions and human rights with impunity. When politicians refuse to act, civil society must accept the responsibility. That is why I support those who campaign for justice for Palestine and why I am honoured to be a Patron of PSC.

Now the situation is even more desperate. Israel is continuing its formal annexation of stolen Palestinian land and reinforcing its system of apartheid. The demolition of homes continues apace. Israel’s illegal siege of Gaza has already devastated the lives of those who live there. It is now, inevitably, making the effects of the pandemic even more intolerable.  

Despite this brutal oppression some Arab regimes, themselves no supporters of human rights, are ‘normalising’ their relations with Israel, encouraging it in its crimes against humanity.

PSC will continue its fight for justice for Palestinians. That is why, as a Patron, I am writing to you now. We must ensure PSC has the resources to continue its campaign to reach trades unions, universities, all such institutions and people of goodwill.

After all the injustice that Palestinians have suffered, there is now an attempt to silence their voices. This is an urgent call to please give what you can, however small to help PSC in its essential work to demand justice and freedom for Palestine.
 
Donate to PSC's vital work for Palestine
Yours in solidarity,

Ken Loach, PSC Patron

Sunday 20 December 2020

London and the Eastern European Oligarchs

 This trend of allowing corrupt eastern european oligarchs residency-in London, under both Conservative and Labour governments, whilst at the other end of the scale we have the Windrush scandal and the constant harrying and deportation of genuine political refugees makes my blood boil.   https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55389134                                                              


 It says much about the depraved society that  Britain has become. There is a time when silence becomes becomes betrayal - Martin Luther King.

Friday 18 December 2020

Stop the War in Yemen.

 

Jan 25 World Says No to War on Yemen

Joint Statement: World Says No to War on Yemen
CALL TO PROTEST INTERNATIONALLY
Monday January 25, 2021

Since 2015, the Saudi-led bombing and blockade of Yemen have killed tens of thousands of people and devastated the country. The U.N. calls this the largest humanitarian crisis on Earth. Half the country’s people are on the brink of famine, the country has the world’s worst cholera outbreak in modern history, and now Yemen has one of the very worst COVID death rates in the world: It kills 1 in 4 people it infects. The pandemic, along with withdrawal of aid, is pushing more people into acute hunger.

And yet Saudi Arabia is escalating its war and tightening its blockade.

The war is only possible because Western countries — and the United States and Britain in particular — continue to arm Saudi Arabia and provide military, political and logistical support for the war. The Western powers are active participants and have the power to stop the world’s most acute human crisis.

The disaster in Yemen is man-made. It is caused by the war and blockade. It can be ended.

People and organizations from the U.S., Britain, Canada, France, Italy, and across the world, are coming together to call for an end to the war in Yemen and solidarity with the people of Yemen. We demand that right now our governments:

  • Stop foreign aggression on Yemen.
  • Stop weapons and war support for Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
  • Lift the blockade on Yemen and open all land and sea ports.
  • Restore and expand humanitarian aid for the people of Yemen.

We call on people around the world to protest the war on January 25, 2021, just days after the U.S. presidential inauguration and the day before Saudi Arabia’s ‘Davos in the Desert’ Future Investment Initiative.

We ask individuals and organizations everywhere to call for protests — with masks and other safety precautions — in their towns and cities on that day and make clear that the WORLD SAYS NO TO WAR ON YEMEN.

Please add your organization’s name to this statement. For more information, please contact national@actioncorps.org. 

  1. Stop the War Coalition (UK)
  2. Action Corps (US)
  3. Yemeni Alliance Committee (US) 
  4. Yemen Relief and Reconstruction Foundation (US)
  5. CODEPINK (US)
  6. Just Foreign Policy (US) 
  7. Voices for Creative Nonviolence

Wednesday 16 December 2020

The Jewish Voice for Peace.

 In a world of apathy these Jewish people speak up for Palestinian rights. You can bet that Kier Starmer would accuse them of antisemitism.


Throughout this long, difficult, and unpredictable year, one thing was certain: JVP was here. 

I could not be more proud of how our community showed up for justice and equality for ALL in Palestine/Israel – and across the U.S. – in the face of both entrenched challenges and new hurdles we couldn’t have imagined just a year ago. 

I got chills watching this video highlighting what the JVP community accomplished this year. I hope it reminds of you of the world that is possible – the world we are building together.

The work we did this year was a testament to your strength, agility, and moral clarity. Thank you for being a vital part of Jewish Voice for Peace. 

Onward,

head shot
 

Stefanie Fox
Executive Director

 

Jewish Voice for Peace is a national membership organization inspired by Jewish tradition to work for the justice, equality, and dignity of all the people of Israel/Palestine. Become a JVP Member today.


Saturday 14 November 2020

Join Jewish Voice for Peace and the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign Arts and Culture Rally

 


We're delighted to announce an evening of poetry, music, and inspirational speakers. Register now for the ONLINE RALLY IN SOLIDARITY WITH PALESTINIANS... and tune in from home.

                                                                   
Register for the rally (it's free!)
On Sunday 29th November @ 5pm, to mark the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, we'll be joined by the likes of Omar Barghouti, Maxine Peake, Noura Erakat, and Aja Monet.

Join us over Zoom, and celebrate Palestinian culture and resistance from the comfort of your armchair. The rally will last for approximately an hour and a quarter.
                       
Register to join the rally with poet Aja Monet and many other speakers/performers
Join the rally for Palestine

We're honoured to be co-hosting this international rally with our partners at Jewish Voice for Peace and the BDS National Committee.

It comes as part of a "WEEK OF SOLIDARITY" that includes a national day of action, and our Virtual Lobby of Parliament. Please get involved where you can.

Saturday 7 November 2020

The President of the USA

 I keep hoping that one day there’ll be a presidential candidate who just says very plainly: I don’t want to invade anyone else’s country or drone their wedding parties; I don’t want to torture anyone; I don’t want your family to go bankrupt from the bills for your daughter’s chemo; I want you to be paid fairly for the work you do and not be preyed upon by bill collectors when you’re unemployed; I want you to have a roof over your head and clean water to drink; I don’t want your kids to go hungry at school or be thrown in jail for smoking grass or be shot by the police while walking home from the 7/11; I want you to have time off to enjoy your life and not worry about your house burning down in a wildfire or being swept away in a hurricane. Is that too much to ask? Where is this person?

Jeffrey St. Clair is editor of CounterPunch. 




Friday 30 October 2020

Tyranny

 “the party will be closely monitoring  members’ and officials’ social media accounts” . A threat issued  from an authoritarian organisation opposed to free speech by Lisa Nandy of the Labour Party 29 October 2020 after Jeremy Corbyn’s suspension. 

 Jeremy Corbyn’s suspension from the Labour party is solely due to his support for the Palestinian people who are being slowly exterminated by the Israeli nation. Starmer is a puppet of the Israelis* and his actions shame him and make him unfit to be the leader of the Labour Party.


*Recently published data shows Labour leader Keir Starmer received a £50,000 donation from pro-Israel lobbyist Trevor Chinn – information which was not disclosed until after polls had closed in the leadership election


Sunday 26 July 2020

Jerem Corbyn gofundme

It is reported that John Ware a reporter for Panorama is taking legal action for libel against former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.  The relentless attacks on Mr Corbyn, a man of integrity, honesty and humility cannot be allowed to continue and we have an opportunity here to offer him support in a practical way.  It will also let him know that his supporters have not forgotten him, nor have they gone away.

Updates (1)




  • 24 JULY 2020by Carole MorganOrganiser

    I wanted to take this opportunity to express my deepest gratitude to everyone for the most amazing and overwhelming response to this fundraiser for Jeremy Corbyn. Although Jeremy did not know beforehand that I was going to start this campaign, Jeremy's office has been in touch and he is deeply touched by this outpouring of love and support from you all.

    The funds on this campaign will not be touched and remain on hold by GoFundMe until the details for distribution have been established with Jeremy's office and I will continue to provide updates as they become available.

    As you know, when I began this just over 24 hours ago, I wasn't sure what response I would get (why would I, I've never been moved to do anything like this before). However, like you, I am outraged by the unrelenting attacks on Jeremy Corbyn, a man who only ever wanted the best for the people of this country, and who lead with humility, integrity and honesty.

    These ongoing attacks, both legal and political drove me to want to do something about it, and to let Jeremy know he is not alone. Far too many injustices have, and are being leveled at Jeremy that I have no doubt that this fund will help support him in what he is facing. Through this fund, it will become known that Jeremy is NOT alone. He is NOT the few. He is one amongst the many and we have started a fight back!

    My gratitude to you all.

    Carole

     As a result of this spontaneous wonderful selfless gesture by Carol Morgan the fight back on Jeremy Corbyn’s behalf has begun and the fund now exceeds £260,000. If you would like to make a contribution then please follow this. link.